Topic module

Assessing Additional Evidence

Judge whether new information strengthens, weakens or leaves unchanged the exact route from reasons to conclusion.

Long-form learning
Concept to Risk to Memory to Check-up

How to prepare for the TARA

Learn the official question types, practise five-option reasoning without a calculator, and rehearse one 40-minute writing process that explains, counters and judges a proposition.

Core concepts

Concept 1

Evidence matters through its effect on the argument's stated conclusion and supporting link.

Exam cue: Identify the conclusion and vulnerable support link first.

Concept 2

New information may be relevant to the topic without strengthening or weakening the argument.

Exam cue: State the direction and mechanism of each option's effect.

Concept 3

Evidence can affect a premise, an assumption, an alternative explanation or the conclusion's scope.

Exam cue: Reject information that changes a nearby issue but not the argument.

Risk pitfalls and guardrails

Equating topical relevance with argumentative impact.

Guardrail: Do not import subject detail the task does not require or confuse a plausible result with one established by the supplied reasoning.

Choosing evidence that supports a different conclusion.

Guardrail: Do not import subject detail the task does not require or confuse a plausible result with one established by the supplied reasoning.

Failing to notice that an option weakens the reliability of the original evidence.

Guardrail: Do not import subject detail the task does not require or confuse a plausible result with one established by the supplied reasoning.

Memory anchors

Target the Conclusion

Measure evidence against the argument actually made.

Mechanism

Explain how the new fact changes a reason, assumption or alternative.

Strengthen

New evidence makes the conclusion better supported.

Weaken

New evidence damages support or supplies a credible alternative.

No Effect

Related information may leave the inferential link unchanged.

Direction Check

Do not choose weakening evidence when the stem asks for strengthening.

Checkpoint rule

Do the check-up only after you can summarize each concept in one sentence and identify one dangerous pitfall from memory.

Knowledge Check (after reading)

Short check-up to confirm understanding of this module.

Check-up Questions

1-2 question checkpoint

A school argues that later start times will reduce lateness because many pupils miss early buses. Which additional evidence would most strengthen the argument?

A café claims its reusable-cup discount reduced disposable cup waste because fewer disposable cups were ordered after launch. Which evidence would most weaken the claim?

Answer all questions to submit.

Next step personalized recommendations

What is Pass Harbor?

Completely free exam prep for 247 UK exams.

  • Practice questions
  • Flashcards
  • Study guides
  • Mock exams
  • No registration
  • No paywall
  • Start instantly
No more expensive exam prep. Quality study tools should be accessible to everyone.