4. Family-provision Claims, Contentious Probate and Practice
Identify potential 1975 Act and validity disputes, advise unmarried parties, preserve the estate and manage risk and profitability in probate practice.
How to study the CPQ Professional stage
Build the independent research and business-report skills required for P1, then prepare the work-relevant tasks in the one P2–P10 pathway on your record.
Core concepts
Concept 1
A 1975 Act claim depends on applicant class, time, provision standard, statutory factors and available orders.
Exam cue: Identify claimant status, grant date, need and estate position.
Concept 2
Contentious probate may concern capacity, knowledge and approval, undue influence, execution or later instruments.
Exam cue: Preserve documents, capacity evidence and the estate pending dispute.
Concept 3
A sustainable probate practice manages scope, pricing, delegation, supervision, complaints and professional risk.
Exam cue: Set clear retainer, budget, milestones and escalation.
Risk pitfalls and guardrails
Confusing a validity challenge with a family-provision claim.
Guardrail: Do not study all nine pathways as mandatory, treat P1 as a timed exam, confuse passage with authorisation or rely on outdated law, tax, procedure or regulator guidance.
Missing the claim deadline while negotiating.
Guardrail: Do not study all nine pathways as mandatory, treat P1 as a timed exam, confuse passage with authorisation or rely on outdated law, tax, procedure or regulator guidance.
Distributing despite a notified dispute.
Guardrail: Do not study all nine pathways as mandatory, treat P1 as a timed exam, confuse passage with authorisation or rely on outdated law, tax, procedure or regulator guidance.
Memory anchors
1975 Act
Applicant, deadline, provision, factors, estate and order.
Validity dispute
Capacity, knowledge, influence, formality and revocation.
Probate practice
Scope, price, process, supervision, risk and client care.
Checkpoint rule
Do the check-up only after you can summarize each concept in one sentence and identify one dangerous pitfall from memory.
Knowledge Check (after reading)
Short check-up to confirm understanding of this module.
Check-up Questions
An adult child says the will is unfair but alleges no invalidity. Which route may be relevant?
A 1975 Act claimant approaches near six months from the grant. What is urgent?
Answer all questions to submit.
Next step personalized recommendations
Continue learning
Move forward only after this module is stable.
What is Pass Harbor?
Completely free exam prep for 247 UK exams.
- Practice questions
- Flashcards
- Study guides
- Mock exams
- No registration
- No paywall
- Start instantly
“No more expensive exam prep. Quality study tools should be accessible to everyone.”