Arguments for Existence and Non-existence
Reconstructing and evaluating contrasting cosmological, design, ontological or other arguments about God, gods or ultimate reality.
How to study A-level Religious Studies
Clarify the approach, explain sources and interpretations accurately, compare significant ideas, analyse their influence and reach a reasoned judgement.
Core concepts
Concept 1
A posteriori arguments reason from features of the world, while a priori arguments reason through concepts or necessity.
Exam cue: Set out the argument in premise-and-conclusion form.
Concept 2
Evaluation tests premises, inference, explanatory scope and whether the conclusion establishes the claimed religious reality.
Exam cue: Distinguish a challenge to the evidence from a challenge to the inference.
Concept 3
Arguments for non-existence may appeal to incoherence, evidential absence, natural explanations or conflicts among attributes.
Exam cue: Ask how much of the religious conclusion the argument can support.
Targeted study blocks
Common study lens
Build transferable religious-studies understanding
Learn at least three contrasting arguments and evaluate their reasoning, conclusion and relation to religious belief.
Entered-route lens
Apply the exact selected tradition, text and scholars
Use the exact versions, objections and scholars named in the entered specification rather than a generic argument label.
Risk pitfalls and guardrails
Presenting several named arguments as one blended proof.
Guardrail: Do not present one denomination, school, scholar or board option as though it represented every learner or every religious tradition.
Assuming a cause of the universe must have every classical divine attribute.
Guardrail: Do not present one denomination, school, scholar or board option as though it represented every learner or every religious tradition.
Calling an argument circular without showing where the conclusion is assumed.
Guardrail: Do not present one denomination, school, scholar or board option as though it represented every learner or every religious tradition.
Memory anchors
A Priori
An a priori argument does not depend for its justification on particular sense experience.
A Posteriori
An a posteriori argument reasons from experience or observed features of the world.
Cosmological Argument
Cosmological reasoning moves from contingency, causation or dependence toward an ultimate explanation.
Design Argument
Design reasoning infers purposive intelligence from order, regularity or apparent fine-tuning.
Ontological Argument
Ontological reasoning moves from the concept of a maximally great or necessary being toward existence.
Checkpoint rule
Do the check-up only after you can summarize each concept in one sentence and identify one dangerous pitfall from memory.
Knowledge Check (after reading)
Short check-up to confirm understanding of this module.
Check-up Questions
What is the starting point of Aquinas's First Way?
What does Aquinas infer from essentially ordered causes?
Answer all questions to submit.
Next step personalized recommendations
Continue learning
Move forward only after this module is stable.
What is Pass Harbor?
Completely free exam prep for 247 UK exams.
- Practice questions
- Flashcards
- Study guides
- Mock exams
- No registration
- No paywall
- Start instantly
“No more expensive exam prep. Quality study tools should be accessible to everyone.”