Cosmological Arguments
Evaluate arguments from beginning, change, causation, contingency and sufficient reason.
How to study A-level Philosophy
Learn each position as an argument, connect it to its strongest objection and reply, then decide what conclusion the dialectic supports.
Core concepts
Concept 1
Cosmological arguments infer a first, sustaining or necessary explanation from features of the cosmos.
Exam cue: State whether the explanandum is a beginning, change, causation, contingency or continued existence.
Concept 2
The set routes include the Kalam argument, Aquinas's first three Ways, Descartes on continuing existence and Leibniz's principle of sufficient reason.
Exam cue: Distinguish a temporal first cause from an ontologically sustaining cause.
Concept 3
Challenges concern infinite series, the causal principle, composition and whether a necessary being is coherent or identifiable as God.
Exam cue: Test the move from an explained member to an explanation of the whole series.
Targeted study blocks
Specified core
Secure the claim and its place in the debate
Keep the Kalam, Thomist, Cartesian and Leibnizian arguments separate and apply the infinite-series, Humean, Russellian and necessary-being challenges accurately.
Philosophical work
Reconstruct, challenge and judge the argument
Track the required explanatory principle, whether a regress is vicious and whether the proposed terminus explains more than it assumes.
Risk pitfalls and guardrails
Combining all cosmological arguments into a single first-cause proof.
Guardrail: Do not replace philosophical reasoning with quotation, biography, intuition or a philosopher's name.
Assuming an infinite series automatically has no explanation.
Guardrail: Do not replace philosophical reasoning with quotation, biography, intuition or a philosopher's name.
Moving from a necessary being to all classical divine attributes without argument.
Guardrail: Do not replace philosophical reasoning with quotation, biography, intuition or a philosopher's name.
Memory anchors
Kalam
The Kalam argument infers a cause from the claim that the universe began to exist.
Aquinas's Ways
The first three Ways reason from change, efficient cause and contingency.
Continuing cause
Descartes asks what sustains existence at each moment, not only what began it.
PSR
The principle of sufficient reason requires an adequate explanation for every fact or existence.
Fallacy of composition
A property of each part does not automatically belong to the whole.
Checkpoint rule
Do the check-up only after you can summarize each concept in one sentence and identify one dangerous pitfall from memory.
Knowledge Check (after reading)
Short check-up to confirm understanding of this module.
Check-up Questions
What do cosmological arguments infer from?
What is the Kalam argument's basic form?
Answer all questions to submit.
Next step personalized recommendations
Continue learning
Move forward only after this module is stable.
What is Pass Harbor?
Completely free exam prep for 247 UK exams.
- Practice questions
- Flashcards
- Study guides
- Mock exams
- No registration
- No paywall
- Start instantly
“No more expensive exam prep. Quality study tools should be accessible to everyone.”